Babri Masjid Verdict News 30-09-2010 30th Sept Latest Court Judgement Result

The Verdict , or the Court Judgement for Babri Masjid will be pronounced today(30-09-2010 30th Sept) in about few minutes.
Here are the latest updates, News

16:31: Ram idols existed on site: Allahabad HC
The Allahabad High Court ruled today that the Ayodhya land is to be divided into three parts -- one part goes to the Nirmohi Akhara, one to the Babri Committee and the other to the Ram Janmasthan (the central dome). The title suit of the Sunni Waqf board has been rejected. The HC also ruled that idols of Ram existed in the site. 


16:24: Disputed land split into 3 parts
The Allahabad High Court rules by majority that the disputed land in Ayodhya be divided into three parts to be distributed among the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party for 'Ram Lalla', say lawyers.

---

16:22: HC dismisses Waqf Board title suit
Delivering their verdict that all of India has remained glued to, the three-judge special bench of the Allahabad high court, comprising Justice S U Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D V Sharma, today declared that the title suit filed by the Sunni Waqf Board has been dismissed. Two of the three judges - Justices Sudhir Agarwal and D V Sharma - concurred in the judgment, while Justice S U Khan differed with the majority view. The judgment runs into 8000 pages. Further details are awaited. Meanwhile, the status quo will continue on the land for three more months.

---

16:16: Judgment delivered in the Ayodhya suit
The three-judge special bench of the Allahabad high court, comprising Justice S U Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D V Sharma have delivered the verdict in the Ayodhya title suit. The judgment runs into 8000 pages. Further details are awaited.

AYODHYA: The Allahabad High Court has announced its verdict on the Babri Mosque case, ruling in favour of the Hindus.


1) Justice S U Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice D V Sharma start the proceedings to pronounce the judgement in the Ayodhya title suit. The litigants have reached Court No. 21 of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. Barricades have been erected about 100 metres from the court room and no one other than those connected with the case are being allowed anywhere near the court room.

The Court will take decision on following 28 Questions

These include:

* Whether the demolished structure was a mosque as claimed by the plaintiff Muslim organisations;
* If so, when was it built and by whom -- Mughal emperor Babar or his Awadh governor Mir Baqi Tashqandi;
* Was it built on the site of a demolished Hindu temple?
* Whether Muslims prayed in the Babri mosque from time immemorial;
* Whether they possessed the property openly and continuously from 1528 when it was allegedly built;
* Whether they possessed it till 1949 when they were dispossessed;
* Whether the suit was filed too late;
* Whether the Hindus have earned the right to pray at the site through adverse and continuous possession;
* Whether the plot is Ram's birthplace;
* Whether Hindus have worshipped the site as Ram's birthplace from time immemorial;
* Whether the idols and other objects of worship were placed in the structure on the night of December 22-23, 1949, or whether they had been there before.

Other issues framed in the course of handling the suit that may be decided are:

* Whether the Ram chabutra -- the raised platform adjacent to the disputed structure -- as well as the Bhandar and Sita Rasoi were demolished along with the main structure;
* Whether the land adjoining the structure on its east, north and south housed an ancient graveyard and a mosque;
* Whether the structure is 'landlocked' and cannot be reached except by passing through Hindus' places of worship around it;
* Whether no mosque can come into existence on the plot in view of Islamic tenets (because idols have been placed there);
* Whether the structure could not legally be a mosque since it did not have minarets;
* Whether it could not be a mosque as it is hemmed in by a graveyard from three sides;
* Whether, after the demolition, it can still be called a mosque;
* Whether Muslims can use the open ground at the site as a mosque to offer prayers following the demolition of the structure;
* Whether and what relief, if any, the plaintiffs (Muslim organisations) are entitled to.